There has long been an argument against maintaining zoos in which animals ar regular away from their inherent habitat, and there is strong evidence to put forward that technology has developed to a point where such institutions be no long-term needed, as will now be argued. Traditionally, the principal argument voiced by those who wish to observe zoos was that it allowed children and adults to work through animals which they more than than likely would not nurture had a chance to do if this had required visiting the creatures natural environment. withal there atomic number 18 now online videos and websites where these animals great dish up be seen in high definition, therefore no monthlong needing to go to enclosures to see the animals. This is clearly evident by the declining tot of visitors in young years. In addition, there are many cases in which animals held in captivity are not wellhead cared for and are apply solely to exploit them for profit. In al approximately rare cases, the animals can suffer from neglect or malnutrition, and kinda than being kept healthy are simply replaced when they are no longer of any value. Granted, there are situations in which endangered species are protected and their numbers allowed to rebuild by housing them in the security of a zoo. However, in most cases the same inwardness is better achieved by using more open jut wildlife parks rather than traditional caged enclosures. In sum, the factors which first conduct to the creation of zoos have been reduced by the ability of technology, so unless there is some advantage for the species itself, consequently the use of zoos should no longer be supported.If you want to enchant a wide essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.