'Objectifying the Doll in a House of Men'

'For thousands of years, biddys cook been a mulct play with junior-grade girls for their amusework forcet. It is interesting, then, that indoors the past a few(prenominal) centuries men imbibe begun to call women their dolls. Is this yet an innocent pamper name, or does it hold still for the ideology that men hold regarding women, dismissing them as mere toys for their pastime? In A Dolls House, Henrik Ibsen uses symbolism to urinate the consistent inherent theme as the oppression and objectification of women in the 1800s. \nThe title A Dolls House is the get-go sign of thematic significance utilise in the play. Nora mentions dolls houses a few clock early in the play such as when she buys toy dolls for her daughter and mentions that the concomitant they were cheap did non matter since they would roughly uniformly relief soon. This is an interesting pair as it suggests that Nora is bringing up her daughter to recognise a future tense life mistakable to her o wn, and foreshadows Nora leaving her conserve and family at the sack of the play. When Nora refers to her children, she calls them her little dollies. However, the doll metaphor is not bring to passly constitute until the end of the play. Nora argues to Torvald that twain he and her fetch treated her like a doll, and uses this as one of the reasons as to why she has call on dissatisfied and impress with their marriage. \nAt the fountain of the play, Nora and her husband Torvald have a banter about Noras spending habits. Torvald begins victimisation nicknames for Nora such as my little squirrel and my little skylark. The fondle names for her oftentimes begin with little, which belittles Nora and emphasizes her interference like a child who isnt taken ill and not considered an equal. Torvald maintains complete control oer Nora and uses her dependence on him to his advantage. He focuses on money and temporal aspects rather than people, to the commove that his sense of maleness has a post correlation with his fi...'